Jarzynski equality: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Added a reference)
m (→‎References: Added a publication)
 
Line 17: Line 17:
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3132747 Eric N. Zimanyi and Robert J. Silbey "The work-Hamiltonian connection and the usefulness of the Jarzynski equality for free energy calculations", Journal of Chemical Physics '''130''' 171102 (2009)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3132747 Eric N. Zimanyi and Robert J. Silbey "The work-Hamiltonian connection and the usefulness of the Jarzynski equality for free energy calculations", Journal of Chemical Physics '''130''' 171102 (2009)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/31/5/012 Humberto Híjar and José M Ortiz de Zárate "Jarzynski's equality illustrated by simple examples", European Journal of Physics '''31''' pp. 1097 (2010)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/31/5/012 Humberto Híjar and José M Ortiz de Zárate "Jarzynski's equality illustrated by simple examples", European Journal of Physics '''31''' pp. 1097 (2010)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2007.04.010 Christopher Jarzynski "Comparison of far-from-equilibrium work relations", Comptes Rendus Physique '''8''' pp. 495-506 (2007)]


[[category: Non-equilibrium thermodynamics]]
[[category: Non-equilibrium thermodynamics]]
[[category: fluctuation theorem]]
[[category: fluctuation theorem]]

Latest revision as of 10:52, 5 July 2011

The Jarzynski equality, also known as the work relation or non-equilibrium work relation was developed by Chris Jarzynski. According to this equality, the equilibrium Helmholtz energy function of a process, (), can be reconstructed by averaging the external work, , performed in many non-equilibrium realizations of the process (Eq. 2a in [1]):

or can be trivially re-written as (Eq. 2b)

where is the Boltzmann constant and is the temperature. The only assumption in the proof of this relation is that of a weak coupling between the system and the reservoir. More recently Jarzynski has re-derived this formula, dispensing with this assumption [2].

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Related reading