9-6 Lennard-Jones potential: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Carl McBride (talk | contribs) (Corrected equation (r_m not sigma)) |
Carl McBride (talk | contribs) (Added Eq in terms of sigma) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:<math> \Phi_{12}(r) = \epsilon \left[ 2\left(\frac{r_m}{r} \right)^{9} - 3\left( \frac{r_m}{r}\right)^6 \right] </math> | :<math> \Phi_{12}(r) = \epsilon \left[ 2\left(\frac{r_m}{r} \right)^{9} - 3\left( \frac{r_m}{r}\right)^6 \right] </math> | ||
or in terms of <math> \sigma </math> (the value of <math>r</math> at which <math> \Phi_{12}(r)=0</math>) one has: | |||
:<math> \Phi_{12}(r) = 6.75 \epsilon \left[ \left(\frac{\sigma}{r} \right)^{9} - \left( \frac{\sigma}{r}\right)^6 \right] </math> | |||
where | where | ||
* <math>r := |\mathbf{r}_1 - \mathbf{r}_2|</math> | * <math>r := |\mathbf{r}_1 - \mathbf{r}_2|</math> | ||
* <math> \Phi_{12}(r) </math> is the [[intermolecular pair potential]] between two particles or ''sites'' | * <math> \Phi_{12}(r) </math> is the [[intermolecular pair potential]] between two particles or ''sites'' | ||
* <math> r_m </math> is the distance, <math>r</math>, at which <math> \Phi_{12}(r)</math> is a minimum. | * <math> r_m </math> is the distance, <math>r</math>, at which <math> \Phi_{12}(r)</math> is a minimum, which corresponds to <math> r_m = 1.5^{1/3} \sigma</math>. | ||
* <math> \epsilon </math> is the well depth (energy) | * <math> \epsilon </math> is the well depth (energy) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:41, 4 February 2014
The 9-6 Lennard-Jones potential (also known as the 6-9 potential) is a variant the more well known Lennard-Jones model. It is used for computing non-bonded interactions. The potential is given by [1] :
or in terms of (the value of at which ) one has:
where
- is the intermolecular pair potential between two particles or sites
- is the distance, , at which is a minimum, which corresponds to .
- is the well depth (energy)
It is worth noting that the inclusion of an odd power (here the 9) adds an additional computational overhead, and the 8-6 Lennard-Jones potential has been suggested as a viable alternative.