Carnahan-Starling equation of state: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Added the errors given by Clisby and McCoy to the table of virial coefficients.)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 31: Line 31:
| 4 || 18.3647684 || 18
| 4 || 18.3647684 || 18
|-  
|-  
| 5 || 28.224512 || 28
| 5 || 28.22451(26) || 28
|-  
|-  
| 6 || 39.8151475 || 40
| 6 || 39.81515(93) || 40
|-
|-
| 7 || 53.3444198 || 54
| 7 || 53.3444(37) || 54
|-
|-
| 8 || 68.5375488 || 70
| 8 || 68.538(18) || 70
|-
|-
| 9 || 85.8128384 || 88
| 9 || 85.813(85) || 88
|-
|-
| 10 || 105.775104 || 108
| 10 || 105.78(39) || 108
|}
|}


Line 81: Line 81:
</math>
</math>
== Liu correction ==
== Liu correction ==
Hongqin Liu proposed a correction to the C-S EOS which improved accuracy by almost two order of magnitude <ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.14357]</ref>:
Hongqin Liu proposed a correction to the C-S EOS which improved accuracy by almost two order of magnitude <ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.14357 Hongqin Liu "Carnahan Starling type equations of state for stable hard disk and hard sphere fluids", arXiv:2010.14357]</ref>:


: <math>
: <math>
Z =  \frac{ 1 + \eta + \eta^2 -  \frac{8}{13}\eta^3 - \eta^4 + frac{1}{2}\ata^5 }{(1-\eta)^3 }.
Z =  \frac{ 1 + \eta + \eta^2 -  \frac{8}{13}\eta^3 - \eta^4 + \frac{1}{2}\eta^5 }{(1-\eta)^3 }.
</math>
</math>


== See also ==  
== See also ==  

Latest revision as of 14:25, 21 March 2023

The Carnahan-Starling equation of state is an approximate (but quite good) equation of state for the fluid phase of the hard sphere model in three dimensions. It is given by (Ref [1] Eqn. 10).

where:

The Carnahan-Starling equation of state is not applicable for packing fractions greater than 0.55 [2].

Virial expansion[edit]

It is interesting to compare the virial coefficients of the Carnahan-Starling equation of state (Eq. 7 of [1]) with the hard sphere virial coefficients in three dimensions (exact up to , and those of Clisby and McCoy [3]):

Clisby and McCoy
2 4 4
3 10 10
4 18.3647684 18
5 28.22451(26) 28
6 39.81515(93) 40
7 53.3444(37) 54
8 68.538(18) 70
9 85.813(85) 88
10 105.78(39) 108

Thermodynamic expressions[edit]

From the Carnahan-Starling equation for the fluid phase the following thermodynamic expressions can be derived (Ref [4] Eqs. 2.6, 2.7 and 2.8)

Pressure (compressibility):


Configurational chemical potential:

Isothermal compressibility:

where is the packing fraction.

Configurational Helmholtz energy function:

The 'Percus-Yevick' derivation[edit]

It is interesting to note (Ref [5] Eq. 6) that one can arrive at the Carnahan-Starling equation of state by adding two thirds of the exact solution of the Percus Yevick integral equation for hard spheres via the compressibility route, to one third via the pressure route, i.e.

The reason for this seems to be a slight mystery (see discussion in Ref. [6] ).

Kolafa correction[edit]

Jiri Kolafa produced a slight correction to the C-S EOS which results in improved accuracy [7]:

Liu correction[edit]

Hongqin Liu proposed a correction to the C-S EOS which improved accuracy by almost two order of magnitude [8]:

See also[edit]

References[edit]