Hard sphere model: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Fixed reference errors)
(Fixed broken links in ref. 5)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1743957    B. J. Alder and T. E. Wainwright "Phase Transition for a Hard Sphere System", Journal of Chemical Physics '''27''' pp. 1208-1209 (1957)]</ref>, much of this work undertaken at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory on the world's first electronic digital computer  ENIAC <ref>[http://ftp.arl.army.mil/~mike/comphist/eniac-story.html The ENIAC Story]</ref>.
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1743957    B. J. Alder and T. E. Wainwright "Phase Transition for a Hard Sphere System", Journal of Chemical Physics '''27''' pp. 1208-1209 (1957)]</ref>, much of this work undertaken at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory on the world's first electronic digital computer  ENIAC <ref>[http://ftp.arl.army.mil/~mike/comphist/eniac-story.html The ENIAC Story]</ref>.
==Liquid phase radial distribution function==
==Liquid phase radial distribution function==
The following are a series of plots of the hard sphere [[radial distribution function]] <ref>The [[total correlation function]] data was produced using the [http://www.vscht.cz/fch/software/hsmd/hspline-8-2004.zip computer code] written by [http://www.vscht.cz/fch/en/people/Jiri.Kolafa.html Jiří Kolafa]</ref> shown for different values of the number density <math>\rho</math>.  The horizontal axis is in units of <math>\sigma</math> where <math>\sigma</math> is set to be 1. Click on image of interest to see a larger view.
The following are a series of plots of the hard sphere [[radial distribution function]] <ref>The [[total correlation function]] data was produced using the [https://old.vscht.cz/fch/software/hsmd/hspline-8-2004.zip computer code] written by [https://web.vscht.cz/~kolafaj/ Jiří Kolafa]</ref> shown for different values of the number density <math>\rho</math>.  The horizontal axis is in units of <math>\sigma</math> where <math>\sigma</math> is set to be 1. Click on image of interest to see a larger view.
:{| border="1"
:{| border="1"
|-  
|-  
Line 55: Line 55:
| <math>\rho^*_{\mathrm {solid}}</math> || <math>\rho^*_{\mathrm {liquid}}</math> || Reference
| <math>\rho^*_{\mathrm {solid}}</math> || <math>\rho^*_{\mathrm {liquid}}</math> || Reference
|-  
|-  
| 1.041|| 0.945 || <ref name="HooverRee"></ref>
| 1.041(4)|| 0.943(4) || <ref name="HooverRee"></ref>
|-  
|-  
| 1.0376|| 0.9391 || <ref name="FrenkelSmitBook">Daan Frenkel and Berend Smit "Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications", Second Edition (2002) (ISBN 0-12-267351-4) p. 261.</ref>
| 1.0376|| 0.9391 || <ref name="FrenkelSmitBook">Daan Frenkel and Berend Smit "Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications", Second Edition (2002) (ISBN 0-12-267351-4) p. 261.</ref>
Line 67: Line 67:
| 1.037 || 0.938 || <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.476396 Ruslan L. Davidchack and Brian B. Laird "Simulation of the hard-sphere crystal–melt interface",  Journal of Chemical Physics '''108''' pp.  9452-9462 (1998)]</ref>
| 1.037 || 0.938 || <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.476396 Ruslan L. Davidchack and Brian B. Laird "Simulation of the hard-sphere crystal–melt interface",  Journal of Chemical Physics '''108''' pp.  9452-9462 (1998)]</ref>
|-  
|-  
| 1.035(3) || 0.936(2) || <ref name="Miguel"> [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3023062 Enrique de Miguel "Estimating errors in free energy calculations from thermodynamic integration using fitted data", Journal of Chemical Physics '''129''' 214112 (2008)]</ref>
| 1.033(3) || 0.935(2) || <ref name="Miguel"> [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3023062 Enrique de Miguel "Estimating errors in free energy calculations from thermodynamic integration using fitted data", Journal of Chemical Physics '''129''' 214112 (2008)]</ref>
|-
| 1.03715(9) || 0.93890(7) || <ref name="MoirEtAl2021"> [https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0058892 Craig Moir, Leo Lue, and Marcus N. Bannerman "Tethered-particle model: The calculation of free energies for hard-sphere systems", Journal of Chemical Physics '''155''' 064504 (2021)]</ref>
|}
|}
The coexistence [[pressure]] has been calculated to be
The coexistence [[pressure]] has been calculated to be
Line 89: Line 91:
|-  
|-  
| 11.43(17) || <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3244562 G. Odriozola "Replica exchange Monte Carlo applied to hard spheres", Journal of Chemical Physics '''131''' 144107 (2009)]</ref>
| 11.43(17) || <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3244562 G. Odriozola "Replica exchange Monte Carlo applied to hard spheres", Journal of Chemical Physics '''131''' 144107 (2009)]</ref>
|-
| 11.550(4) || <ref name="MoirEtAl2021"></ref>
|}
|}
The coexistence [[chemical potential]] has been calculated to be
The coexistence [[chemical potential]] has been calculated to be
Line 96: Line 100:
|-  
|-  
| 15.980(11) || <ref name="Miguel"></ref>
| 15.980(11) || <ref name="Miguel"></ref>
|-
| 16.053(4) || <ref name="MoirEtAl2021"></ref>
|}
|}
The [[Helmholtz energy function]] (in units of <math>Nk_BT</math>) is given by  
The [[Helmholtz energy function]] (in units of <math>Nk_BT</math>) is given by  
Line 113: Line 119:
| <math>\rho^*</math> || <math>A/(Nk_BT)</math>|| Reference
| <math>\rho^*</math> || <math>A/(Nk_BT)</math>|| Reference
|-  
|-  
| 0.25 || 0.620 <math>\pm</math> 0.002 || Table I <ref name="Schilling"> [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3274951 T. Schilling and F. Schmid "Computing absolute free energies of disordered structures by molecular simulation", Journal of Chemical Physics '''131''' 231102 (2009)]</ref>
| 0.25 || −1.766 <math>\pm</math> 0.002 || Table I <ref name="Schilling"> [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3274951 T. Schilling and F. Schmid "Computing absolute free energies of disordered structures by molecular simulation", Journal of Chemical Physics '''131''' 231102 (2009)]</ref>
|-  
|-  
| 0.50 || 1.541 <math>\pm</math> 0.002  || Table I <ref name="Schilling"></ref>
| 0.50 || −0.152 <math>\pm</math> 0.002  || Table I <ref name="Schilling"></ref>
|-  
|-  
| 0.75 || 3.009 <math>\pm</math> 0.002  || Table I <ref name="Schilling"></ref>
| 0.75 || 1.721 <math>\pm</math> 0.002  || Table I <ref name="Schilling"></ref>
|-  
|-  
| 1.04086 || 4.959 || Table VI <ref name="VegaNoya"></ref>
| 1.04086 || 4.959 || Table VI <ref name="VegaNoya"></ref>
Line 125: Line 131:
| 1.150000 || 6.274 || Table VI <ref name="VegaNoya"></ref>
| 1.150000 || 6.274 || Table VI <ref name="VegaNoya"></ref>
|}
|}
In <ref name="Schilling"></ref> the free energies are given without the ideal gas contribution <math>\ln(\rho^*)-1</math> . Hence, it was added to the free energies in the table.
==Interfacial Helmholtz energy function==
==Interfacial Helmholtz energy function==
The [[Helmholtz energy function]] of the solid–liquid [[interface]] has been calculated using the [[cleaving method]] giving (Ref. <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3514144 Ruslan L. Davidchack "Hard spheres revisited: Accurate calculation of the solid–liquid interfacial free energy", Journal of Chemical Physics '''133''' 234701 (2010)]</ref> Table I):
The [[Helmholtz energy function]] of the solid–liquid [[interface]] has been calculated using the [[cleaving method]] giving (Ref. <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3514144 Ruslan L. Davidchack "Hard spheres revisited: Accurate calculation of the solid–liquid interfacial free energy", Journal of Chemical Physics '''133''' 234701 (2010)]</ref> Table I):
Line 143: Line 152:


==Solid structure==
==Solid structure==
The [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KeplerConjecture.html Kepler conjecture] states that the optimal packing for three dimensional spheres is either cubic or hexagonal close [[Lattice Structures | packing]], both of which have maximum densities of <math>\pi/(3 \sqrt{2}) \approx 0.74048%</math><ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/26609 Neil J. A. Sloane "Kepler's conjecture confirmed", Nature '''395''' pp. 435-436 (1998)]</ref>
The [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KeplerConjecture.html Kepler conjecture] states that the optimal packing for three dimensional spheres is either cubic or hexagonal close [[Lattice Structures | packing]], both of which have maximum densities of <math>\pi/(3 \sqrt{2}) \approx 74.048%</math><ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/26609 Neil J. A. Sloane "Kepler's conjecture confirmed", Nature '''395''' pp. 435-436 (1998)]</ref>
<ref>[https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26041-proof-confirmed-of-400-year-old-fruit-stacking-problem/ Jacob Aron "Proof confirmed of 400-year-old fruit-stacking problem", New Scientist daily news 12 August (2014)]</ref>
<ref>[https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26041-proof-confirmed-of-400-year-old-fruit-stacking-problem/ Jacob Aron "Proof confirmed of 400-year-old fruit-stacking problem", New Scientist daily news 12 August (2014)]</ref>
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.52.3632 C. F. Tejero, M. S. Ripoll, and A. Pérez "Pressure of the hard-sphere solid", Physical Review E  '''52''' pp. 3632-3636 (1995)]</ref>. However, for hard spheres at close packing the [[Building up a face centered cubic lattice |face centred cubic]] phase is the more stable
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.52.3632 C. F. Tejero, M. S. Ripoll, and A. Pérez "Pressure of the hard-sphere solid", Physical Review E  '''52''' pp. 3632-3636 (1995)]</ref>. However, for hard spheres at close packing the [[Building up a face centered cubic lattice |face centred cubic]] phase is the more stable

Latest revision as of 12:47, 23 May 2023

Phase diagram (pressure vs packing fraction) of hard sphere system (Solid line - stable branch, dashed line - metastable branch)

The hard sphere model (sometimes known as the rigid sphere model) is defined as

where is the intermolecular pair potential between two spheres at a distance , and is the diameter of the sphere. The hard sphere model can be considered to be a special case of the hard ellipsoid model, where each of the semi-axes has the same length, .

First simulations of hard spheres (1954-1957)[edit]

The hard sphere model, along with its two-dimensional manifestation hard disks, was one of the first ever systems studied using computer simulation techniques with a view to understanding the thermodynamics of the liquid and solid phases and their corresponding phase transition [1] [2] [3], much of this work undertaken at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory on the world's first electronic digital computer ENIAC [4].

Liquid phase radial distribution function[edit]

The following are a series of plots of the hard sphere radial distribution function [5] shown for different values of the number density . The horizontal axis is in units of where is set to be 1. Click on image of interest to see a larger view.

The value of the radial distribution at contact, , can be used to calculate the pressure via the equation of state (Eq. 1 in [6])

where the second virial coefficient, , is given by

.

Carnahan and Starling [7] provided the following expression for (Eq. 3 in [6])

where is the packing fraction.

Over the years many groups have studied the radial distribution function of the hard sphere model: [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]

Liquid-solid transition[edit]

The hard sphere system undergoes a liquid-solid first order transition [19] [20], sometimes referred to as the Kirkwood-Alder transition [21]. The liquid-solid coexistence densities () has been calculated to be

Reference
1.041(4) 0.943(4) [19]
1.0376 0.9391 [22]
1.0367(10) 0.9387(10) [23]
1.0372 0.9387 [24]
1.0369(33) 0.9375(14) [25]
1.037 0.938 [26]
1.033(3) 0.935(2) [27]
1.03715(9) 0.93890(7) [28]

The coexistence pressure has been calculated to be

Reference
11.5727(10) [29]
11.57(10) [23]
11.567 [22]
11.55(11) [30]
11.54(4) [25]
11.50(9) [31]
11.48(11) [27]
11.43(17) [32]
11.550(4) [28]

The coexistence chemical potential has been calculated to be

Reference
15.980(11) [27]
16.053(4) [28]

The Helmholtz energy function (in units of ) is given by

Reference
4.887(3) 3.719(8) [27]

The melting and crystallization process has been studied by Isobe and Krauth [33].

Helmholtz energy function[edit]

Values for the Helmholtz energy function () are given in the following Table:

Reference
0.25 −1.766 0.002 Table I [34]
0.50 −0.152 0.002 Table I [34]
0.75 1.721 0.002 Table I [34]
1.04086 4.959 Table VI [24]
1.099975 5.631 Table VI [24]
1.150000 6.274 Table VI [24]

In [34] the free energies are given without the ideal gas contribution . Hence, it was added to the free energies in the table.

Interfacial Helmholtz energy function[edit]

The Helmholtz energy function of the solid–liquid interface has been calculated using the cleaving method giving (Ref. [35] Table I):

work per unit area/
0.5820(19)
0.636(11) [29]
0.5590(20)
0.5416(31)
0.5669(20)

Solid structure[edit]

The Kepler conjecture states that the optimal packing for three dimensional spheres is either cubic or hexagonal close packing, both of which have maximum densities of [36] [37] [38]. However, for hard spheres at close packing the face centred cubic phase is the more stable [39], with a Helmholtz energy function difference in the thermodynamic limit between the hexagonal close packed and face centered cubic crystals at close packing of 0.001164(8) [40]. Recently evidence has been found for a metastable cI16 phase [41] indicating the "cI16 is a mechanically stable structure that can spontaneously emerge from a bcc starting point but it is thermodynamically metastable relative to fcc or hcp".

Direct correlation function[edit]

For the direct correlation function see: [42] [43]

Bridge function[edit]

Details of the bridge function for hard sphere can be found in the following publication [44]

Equations of state[edit]

Main article: Equations of state for hard spheres

Virial coefficients[edit]

Main article: Hard sphere: virial coefficients

Experimental results[edit]

Pusey and van Megen used a suspension of PMMA particles of radius 305 10 nm, suspended in poly-12-hydroxystearic acid [45] For results obtained from the Colloidal Disorder - Order Transition (CDOT) experiments performed on-board the Space Shuttles Columbia and Discovery see Ref. [46]

Mixtures[edit]

Related systems[edit]

Hard spheres in other dimensions:

References[edit]

  1. Marshall N. Rosenbluth and Arianna W. Rosenbluth "Further Results on Monte Carlo Equations of State", Journal of Chemical Physics 22 pp. 881-884 (1954)
  2. W. W. Wood and J. D. Jacobson "Preliminary Results from a Recalculation of the Monte Carlo Equation of State of Hard Spheres", Journal of Chemical Physics 27 pp. 1207-1208 (1957)
  3. B. J. Alder and T. E. Wainwright "Phase Transition for a Hard Sphere System", Journal of Chemical Physics 27 pp. 1208-1209 (1957)
  4. The ENIAC Story
  5. The total correlation function data was produced using the computer code written by Jiří Kolafa
  6. 6.0 6.1 Fu-Ming Tao, Yuhua Song, and E. A. Mason "Derivative of the hard-sphere radial distribution function at contact", Physical Review A 46 pp. 8007-8008 (1992)
  7. N. F.Carnahan and K. E.Starling,"Equation of State for Nonattracting Rigid Spheres" Journal of Chemical Physics 51 pp. 635-636 (1969)
  8. John G. Kirkwood, Eugene K. Maun, and Berni J. Alder "Radial Distribution Functions and the Equation of State of a Fluid Composed of Rigid Spherical Molecules", Journal of Chemical Physics 18 pp. 1040- (1950)
  9. B. R. A. Nijboer and L. Van Hove "Radial Distribution Function of a Gas of Hard Spheres and the Superposition Approximation", Physical Review 85 pp. 777 - 783 (1952)
  10. B. J. Alder, S. P. Frankel, and V. A. Lewinson "Radial Distribution Function Calculated by the Monte-Carlo Method for a Hard Sphere Fluid", Journal of Chemical Physics 23 pp. 417- (1955)
  11. Francis H. Ree, R. Norris Keeler, and Shaun L. McCarthy "Radial Distribution Function of Hard Spheres", Journal of Chemical Physics 44 pp. 3407- (1966)
  12. W. R. Smith and D. Henderson "Analytical representation of the Percus-Yevick hard-sphere radial distribution function", Molecular Physics 19 pp. 411-415 (1970)
  13. J. A. Barker and D. Henderson "Monte Carlo values for the radial distribution function of a system of fluid hard spheres", Molecular Physics 21 pp. 187-191 (1971)
  14. J. M. Kincaid and J. J. Weis "Radial distribution function of a hard-sphere solid", Molecular Physics 34 pp. 931-938 (1977)
  15. S. Bravo Yuste and A. Santos "Radial distribution function for hard spheres", Physical Review A 43 pp. 5418-5423 (1991)
  16. Jaeeon Chang and Stanley I. Sandler "A real function representation for the structure of the hard-sphere fluid", Molecular Physics 81 pp. 735-744 (1994)
  17. Andrij Trokhymchuk, Ivo Nezbeda and Jan Jirsák "Hard-sphere radial distribution function again", Journal of Chemical Physics 123 024501 (2005)
  18. M. López de Haro, A. Santos and S. B. Yuste "On the radial distribution function of a hard-sphere fluid", Journal of Chemical Physics 124 236102 (2006)
  19. 19.0 19.1 William G. Hoover and Francis H. Ree "Melting Transition and Communal Entropy for Hard Spheres", Journal of Chemical Physics 49 pp. 3609-3617 (1968)
  20. Miguel Robles, Mariano López de Haro and Andrés Santos "Note: Equation of state and the freezing point in the hard-sphere model", Journal of Chemical Physics 140 136101 (2014)
  21. Alice P. Gast and William B. Russel "Simple Ordering in Complex Fluids", Physics Today 51 (12) pp. 24-30 (1998)
  22. 22.0 22.1 Daan Frenkel and Berend Smit "Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications", Second Edition (2002) (ISBN 0-12-267351-4) p. 261.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Andrea Fortini and Marjolein Dijkstra "Phase behaviour of hard spheres confined between parallel hard plates: manipulation of colloidal crystal structures by confinement", Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 18 pp. L371-L378 (2006)
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 Carlos Vega and Eva G. Noya "Revisiting the Frenkel-Ladd method to compute the free energy of solids: The Einstein molecule approach", Journal of Chemical Physics 127 154113 (2007)
  25. 25.0 25.1 Eva G. Noya, Carlos Vega, and Enrique de Miguel "Determination of the melting point of hard spheres from direct coexistence simulation methods", Journal of Chemical Physics 128 154507 (2008)
  26. Ruslan L. Davidchack and Brian B. Laird "Simulation of the hard-sphere crystal–melt interface", Journal of Chemical Physics 108 pp. 9452-9462 (1998)
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 Enrique de Miguel "Estimating errors in free energy calculations from thermodynamic integration using fitted data", Journal of Chemical Physics 129 214112 (2008)
  28. 28.0 28.1 28.2 Craig Moir, Leo Lue, and Marcus N. Bannerman "Tethered-particle model: The calculation of free energies for hard-sphere systems", Journal of Chemical Physics 155 064504 (2021)
  29. 29.0 29.1 L. A. Fernández, V. Martín-Mayor, B. Seoane, and P. Verrocchio "Equilibrium Fluid-Solid Coexistence of Hard Spheres", Physical Review Letters 108 165701 (2012)
  30. Robin J. Speedy "Pressure of the metastable hard-sphere fluid", Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 9 pp. 8591-8599 (1997)
  31. N. B. Wilding and A. D. Bruce "Freezing by Monte Carlo Phase Switch", Physical Review Letters 85 pp. 5138-5141 (2000)
  32. G. Odriozola "Replica exchange Monte Carlo applied to hard spheres", Journal of Chemical Physics 131 144107 (2009)
  33. Masaharu Isobe and Werner Krauth "Hard-sphere melting and crystallization with event-chain Monte Carlo", Journal of Chemical Physics 143 084509 (2015)
  34. 34.0 34.1 34.2 34.3 T. Schilling and F. Schmid "Computing absolute free energies of disordered structures by molecular simulation", Journal of Chemical Physics 131 231102 (2009)
  35. Ruslan L. Davidchack "Hard spheres revisited: Accurate calculation of the solid–liquid interfacial free energy", Journal of Chemical Physics 133 234701 (2010)
  36. Neil J. A. Sloane "Kepler's conjecture confirmed", Nature 395 pp. 435-436 (1998)
  37. Jacob Aron "Proof confirmed of 400-year-old fruit-stacking problem", New Scientist daily news 12 August (2014)
  38. C. F. Tejero, M. S. Ripoll, and A. Pérez "Pressure of the hard-sphere solid", Physical Review E 52 pp. 3632-3636 (1995)
  39. Leslie V. Woodcock "Computation of the free energy for alternative crystal structures of hard spheres", Faraday Discussions 106 pp. 325-338 (1997)
  40. Eva G. Noya and Noé G. Almarza "Entropy of hard spheres in the close-packing limit", Molecular Physics 113 pp. 1061-1068 (2015)
  41. Vadim B. Warshavsky, David M. Ford, and Peter A. Monson "On the mechanical stability of the body-centered cubic phase and the emergence of a metastable cI16 phase in classical hard sphere solids", Journal of Chemical Physics 148 024502 (2018)
  42. C. F. Tejero and M. López De Haro "Direct correlation function of the hard-sphere fluid", Molecular Physics 105 pp. 2999-3004 (2007)
  43. Matthew Dennison, Andrew J. Masters, David L. Cheung, and Michael P. Allen "Calculation of direct correlation function for hard particles using a virial expansion", Molecular Physics pp. 375-382 (2009)
  44. Jiri Kolafa, Stanislav Labik and Anatol Malijevsky "The bridge function of hard spheres by direct inversion of computer simulation data", Molecular Physics 100 pp. 2629-2640 (2002)
  45. P. N. Pusey and W. van Megen "Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres", Nature 320 pp. 340-342 (1986)
  46. Z. Chenga, P. M. Chaikina, W. B. Russelb, W. V. Meyerc, J. Zhub, R. B. Rogersc and R. H. Ottewilld, "Phase diagram of hard spheres", Materials & Design 22 pp. 529-534 (2001)

Related reading

External links[edit]