Gibbs-Duhem integration: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Carl McBride (talk | contribs) m (Changed references to Cite format) |
||
(36 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The so-called Gibbs-Duhem | The so-called '''Gibbs-Duhem integration''' refers to a number of methods that couple | ||
molecular simulation techniques with thermodynamic equations in order to draw | molecular [[Computer simulation techniques |simulation techniques]] with [[Thermodynamic relations |thermodynamic equations]] in order to draw | ||
phase coexistence lines. | [[Computation of phase equilibria | phase coexistence]] lines. The original method was proposed by David Kofke <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00268979300100881 David A. Kofke, "Gibbs-Duhem integration: a new method for direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation", Molecular Physics '''78''' pp 1331 - 1336 (1993)]</ref> | ||
<ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.465023 David A. Kofke, "Direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation via integration along the saturation line", Journal of Chemical Physics '''98''' pp. 4149-4162 (1993)]</ref>. | |||
The method | == Basic Features == | ||
Consider two thermodynamic phases: <math> a </math> and <math> b </math>, at thermodynamic equilibrium at certain conditions. Thermodynamic equilibrium implies: | |||
* Equal [[temperature]] in both phases: <math> T = T_{a} = T_{b} </math>, i.e. thermal equilibrium. | |||
* Equal [[pressure]] in both phases <math> p = p_{a} = p_{b} </math>, i.e. mechanical equilibrium. | |||
* Equal [[chemical potential]]s for the components <math> \mu_i = \mu_{ia} = \mu_{ib} </math>, i.e. ''material'' equilibrium. | |||
In addition, if one is dealing with a statistical mechanical [[models |model]], having certain parameters that can be represented as <math> \lambda </math>, then the | |||
model should be the same in both phases. | |||
== Example: phase equilibria of one-component system == | |||
Notice: The derivation that follows is just a particular route to perform the integration | |||
* Consider that at given conditions of <math> T , p, \lambda </math> two phases of the systems are at equilibrium, this implies: | |||
: <math> \mu_{a} \left( T, p, \lambda \right) = \mu_{b} \left( T, p, \lambda \right) </math> | |||
Given the thermal equilibrium we can also write: | |||
: <math> \beta \mu_{a} \left( \beta, \beta p, \lambda \right) = \beta \mu_{b} \left( \beta, \beta p, \lambda \right) </math> | |||
where | |||
* <math> \beta := 1/k_B T </math>, where <math> k_B </math> is the [[Boltzmann constant]] | |||
When a differential change of the conditions is performed one will have, for any phase: | |||
: <math> d \left( \beta\mu \right) = \left[ \frac{ \partial (\beta \mu) }{\partial \beta} \right]_{\beta p,\lambda} d \beta + | |||
\left[ \frac{ \partial (\beta \mu) }{\partial (\beta p)} \right]_{\beta,\lambda} d (\beta p) + | |||
\left[ \frac{ \partial (\beta \mu) }{\partial \lambda} \right]_{\beta,\beta p} d \lambda. | |||
</math> | |||
Taking into account that <math> \mu </math> is the [[Gibbs energy function]] per particle | |||
: <math> d \left( \beta\mu \right) = \frac{E}{N} d \beta + \frac{ V }{N } d (\beta p) + | |||
\left[ \frac{ \partial (\beta \mu) }{\partial \lambda} \right]_{\beta,\beta p} d \lambda. | |||
</math> | |||
where: | |||
* <math> \left. E \right. </math> is the [[internal energy]] (sometimes written as <math>U</math>). | |||
* <math> \left. V \right. </math> is the volume | |||
* <math> \left. N \right. </math> is the number of particles | |||
<math> \left. \right. E, V </math> are the mean values of the energy and volume for a system of <math> \left. N \right. </math> particles | |||
in the isothermal-isobaric ensemble | |||
Let us use a bar to design quantities divided by the number of particles: e.g. <math> \bar{E} = E/N; \bar{V} = V/N </math>; | |||
and taking into account the definition: | |||
: <math> \bar{L} \equiv \left[ \frac {\partial (\beta \mu )}{\partial \lambda }\right]_{\beta,\beta p} </math> | |||
Again, let us suppose that we have a phase coexistence at a point given by <math>\left[ \beta_0, (\beta p)_0, \lambda_0 \right]</math> and that | |||
we want to modify slightly the conditions. In order to keep the system at the coexistence conditions: | |||
: <math> d \left[ \beta \mu_{a} - \beta \mu_b \right] = 0 </math> | |||
Therefore, to keep the system on the coexistence conditions, the changes in the variables <math> \beta, (\beta p), \lambda </math> are | |||
constrained to fulfill: | |||
:<math> \left( \Delta \bar{E} \right) d \beta + \left( \Delta \bar{V} \right) d (\beta p) + \left(\Delta \bar{L} \right) d \lambda = 0 </math> | |||
where for any property <math> X </math> we can define: <math> \Delta X \equiv X_a - X_b </math> (i.e. the difference between the values of the property in the phases). | |||
Taking a path with, for instance constant <math> \beta </math>, the coexistence line will follow the trajectory produced by the solution of the | |||
differential equation: | |||
:<math> d(\beta p) = - \frac{ \Delta \bar{L} }{\Delta \bar{V} } d \lambda. </math> (Eq. 1) | |||
The Gibbs-Duhem integration technique, for this example, will be a numerical procedure covering the following tasks: | |||
* Computer simulation (for instance using [[Metropolis Monte Carlo]] in the [[Isothermal-isobaric ensemble |NpT ensemble]]) runs to estimate the values of <math> \bar{L}, \bar{V} </math> for both | |||
phases at given values of <math> [\beta, \beta p, \lambda ] </math>. | |||
* A procedure to solve numerically the differential equation (Eq.1) | |||
== Peculiarities of the method (Warnings) == | |||
* A good initial point must be known to start the procedure (See <ref>[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2137705 A. van 't Hof, S. W. de Leeuw, and C. J. Peters "Computing the starting state for Gibbs-Duhem integration", Journal of Chemical Physics '''124''' 054905 (2006)]</ref> and [[computation of phase equilibria]]). | |||
* The ''integrand'' of the differential equation is computed with some numerical uncertainty | |||
* Care must be taken to reduce (and estimate) possible departures from the correct coexistence lines | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | |||
'''Related reading''' | |||
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2137706 A. van 't Hof, C. J. Peters, and S. W. de Leeuw "An advanced Gibbs-Duhem integration method: Theory and applications", Journal of Chemical Physics '''124''' 054906 (2006)] | |||
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3486090 Gerassimos Orkoulas "Communication: Tracing phase boundaries via molecular simulation: An alternative to the Gibbs–Duhem integration method", Journal of Chemical Physics '''133''' 111104 (2010)] | |||
[[category: computer simulation techniques]] |
Latest revision as of 12:02, 28 September 2010
The so-called Gibbs-Duhem integration refers to a number of methods that couple molecular simulation techniques with thermodynamic equations in order to draw phase coexistence lines. The original method was proposed by David Kofke [1] [2].
Basic Features[edit]
Consider two thermodynamic phases: and , at thermodynamic equilibrium at certain conditions. Thermodynamic equilibrium implies:
- Equal temperature in both phases: , i.e. thermal equilibrium.
- Equal pressure in both phases , i.e. mechanical equilibrium.
- Equal chemical potentials for the components , i.e. material equilibrium.
In addition, if one is dealing with a statistical mechanical model, having certain parameters that can be represented as , then the model should be the same in both phases.
Example: phase equilibria of one-component system[edit]
Notice: The derivation that follows is just a particular route to perform the integration
- Consider that at given conditions of two phases of the systems are at equilibrium, this implies:
Given the thermal equilibrium we can also write:
where
- , where is the Boltzmann constant
When a differential change of the conditions is performed one will have, for any phase:
Taking into account that is the Gibbs energy function per particle
where:
- is the internal energy (sometimes written as ).
- is the volume
- is the number of particles
are the mean values of the energy and volume for a system of particles in the isothermal-isobaric ensemble
Let us use a bar to design quantities divided by the number of particles: e.g. ; and taking into account the definition:
Again, let us suppose that we have a phase coexistence at a point given by and that we want to modify slightly the conditions. In order to keep the system at the coexistence conditions:
Therefore, to keep the system on the coexistence conditions, the changes in the variables are constrained to fulfill:
where for any property we can define: (i.e. the difference between the values of the property in the phases). Taking a path with, for instance constant , the coexistence line will follow the trajectory produced by the solution of the differential equation:
- (Eq. 1)
The Gibbs-Duhem integration technique, for this example, will be a numerical procedure covering the following tasks:
- Computer simulation (for instance using Metropolis Monte Carlo in the NpT ensemble) runs to estimate the values of for both
phases at given values of .
- A procedure to solve numerically the differential equation (Eq.1)
Peculiarities of the method (Warnings)[edit]
- A good initial point must be known to start the procedure (See [3] and computation of phase equilibria).
- The integrand of the differential equation is computed with some numerical uncertainty
- Care must be taken to reduce (and estimate) possible departures from the correct coexistence lines
References[edit]
- ↑ David A. Kofke, "Gibbs-Duhem integration: a new method for direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation", Molecular Physics 78 pp 1331 - 1336 (1993)
- ↑ David A. Kofke, "Direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation via integration along the saturation line", Journal of Chemical Physics 98 pp. 4149-4162 (1993)
- ↑ A. van 't Hof, S. W. de Leeuw, and C. J. Peters "Computing the starting state for Gibbs-Duhem integration", Journal of Chemical Physics 124 054905 (2006)
Related reading
- A. van 't Hof, C. J. Peters, and S. W. de Leeuw "An advanced Gibbs-Duhem integration method: Theory and applications", Journal of Chemical Physics 124 054906 (2006)
- Gerassimos Orkoulas "Communication: Tracing phase boundaries via molecular simulation: An alternative to the Gibbs–Duhem integration method", Journal of Chemical Physics 133 111104 (2010)