Talk:Autocorrelation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (comment) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I guess that the second equation should be changed. It seems that it is not | I guess that the second equation should be changed. It seems that it is not | ||
a proper "auto"-correlation since you have "a" and "b", instead of "a(0)" and "a(0+t)" --Noe 10:49, 23 June 2008 (CEST) | a proper "auto"-correlation since you have "a" and "b", instead of "a(0)" and "a(0+t)" --Noe 10:49, 23 June 2008 (CEST) | ||
* That's right, it should be a·a, not a·b. Thanks --[[User:Dduque|Dduque]] 14:31, 23 June 2008 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 13:31, 23 June 2008
I guess that the second equation should be changed. It seems that it is not a proper "auto"-correlation since you have "a" and "b", instead of "a(0)" and "a(0+t)" --Noe 10:49, 23 June 2008 (CEST)
- That's right, it should be a·a, not a·b. Thanks --Dduque 14:31, 23 June 2008 (CEST)