Gibbs-Duhem integration: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 88: Line 88:


== References ==
== References ==
#[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00268979300100881 David A. Kofke,  Gibbs-Duhem integration: a new method for direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation, Mol. Phys. '''78''' , pp 1331 - 1336 (1993)]
#[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00268979300100881 David A. Kofke,  "Gibbs-Duhem integration: a new method for direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation", Molecular Physics '''78''' pp 1331 - 1336 (1993)]
#[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.465023 David A. Kofke,  Direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation via integration along the saturation line,  J. Chem. Phys. '''98''' ,pp. 4149-4162 (1993) ]
#[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.465023 David A. Kofke,  "Direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation via integration along the saturation line"Journal of Chemical Physics  '''98''' pp. 4149-4162 (1993)]
#[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2137705      A. van 't Hof, S. W. de Leeuw, and C. J. Peters "Computing the starting state for Gibbs-Duhem integration", Journal of Chemical Physics  '''124''' 054905 (2006)]
#[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2137706      A. van 't Hof, C. J. Peters, and S. W. de Leeuw "An advanced Gibbs-Duhem integration method: Theory and applications", Journal of Chemical Physics  '''124''' 054906 (2006)]

Revision as of 09:48, 12 April 2007

History

The so-called Gibbs-Duhem Integration refers to a number of methods that couple molecular simulation techniques with thermodynamic equations in order to draw phase coexistence lines. The method was proposed by Kofke (Ref 1-2).

Basic Features

Consider two thermodynamic phases: and , at thermodynamic equilibrium at certain conditions. The thermodynamic equilibrium implies:

  • Equal temperature in both phases: , i.e. thermal equilibrium.
  • Equal pressure in both phases , i.e. mechanical equilibrium.
  • Equal chemical potentials for the components , i.e. material equilibrium.

In addition if we are dealing with a statistical mechanics model, with certain parameters that we can represent as , the model should be the same in both phases.

Example: phase equilibria of one-component system

Notice: The derivation that follows is just a particular route to perform the integration

  • Consider that at given conditions of two phases of the systems are at equilibrium, this implies:

Given the thermal equilibrium we can also write:

where

  • , where is the Boltzmann constant

When a differential change of the conditions is performed one will, have for any phase:

Taking into account that is the Gibbs energy function per particle

where:

  • is the internal energy
  • is the volume
  • is the number of particles

are the mean values of the energy and volume for a system of particles in the isothermal-isobaric ensemble

Let us use a bar to design quantities divided by the number of particles: e.g. ; and taking into account the definition:

Again, let us suppose that we have a phase coexistence at a point given by and that we want to modify slightly the conditions. In order to keep the system at the coexistence conditions:

Therefore, to keep the system on the coexistence conditions, the changes in the variables are constrained to fulfill:

where for any property we can define: (i.e. the difference between the values of the property in the phases). Taking a path with, for instance constant , the coexistence line will follow the trajectory produced by the solution of the differential equation:

(Eq. 1)

The Gibbs-Duhem integration technique, for this example, will be a numerical procedure covering the following tasks:

  • Computer simulation (for instance using Metropolis Monte Carlo in the NpT ensemble) runs to estimate the values of for both

phases at given values of .

  • A procedure to solve numerically the differential equation (Eq.1)

Peculiarities of the method (Warnings)

  • A good initial point must be known to start the procedure
  • The integrand of the differential equation is computed with some numerical uncertainty
  • Care must be taken to reduce (and estimate) possible departures from the correct coexistence lines

References

  1. David A. Kofke, "Gibbs-Duhem integration: a new method for direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation", Molecular Physics 78 pp 1331 - 1336 (1993)
  2. David A. Kofke, "Direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation via integration along the saturation line", Journal of Chemical Physics 98 pp. 4149-4162 (1993)
  3. A. van 't Hof, S. W. de Leeuw, and C. J. Peters "Computing the starting state for Gibbs-Duhem integration", Journal of Chemical Physics 124 054905 (2006)
  4. A. van 't Hof, C. J. Peters, and S. W. de Leeuw "An advanced Gibbs-Duhem integration method: Theory and applications", Journal of Chemical Physics 124 054906 (2006)