Talk:Boltzmann distribution: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (small change) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
but a given energy can be degenerate, so I think that it should be written something like | but a given energy can be degenerate, so I think that it should be written something like | ||
:<math> f(E) \propto \Omega(E) \exp \left[ - E/k_B T \right] </math>, | :<math> f(E) \propto \Omega(E) \exp \left[ - E/k_B T \right] </math>, where | ||
<math> \Omega \left( E \right) </math> is the degeneracy of the energy <math> E </math>. | <math> \Omega \left( E \right) </math> is the degeneracy of the energy <math> E </math>. | ||
Revision as of 12:53, 17 July 2008
I think that the current definition of Boltzmann distribution is misleading. The probability of a microsate, say , is . but a given energy can be degenerate, so I think that it should be written something like
- , where
is the degeneracy of the energy .
therefor
- .
--Noe 10:32, 17 July 2008 (CEST)