Ornstein-Zernike relation: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
*<math>B(r)</math> is the [[Closures | bridge]] function.
*<math>B(r)</math> is the [[Closures | bridge]] function.
*<math>\omega(r)</math> is the [[thermal potential]], <math>\omega(r) \equiv \gamma(r) + B(r)</math>.
*<math>\omega(r)</math> is the [[thermal potential]], <math>\omega(r) \equiv \gamma(r) + B(r)</math>.
*<math>f(r)</math> is the [[Mayer <math>f</math>-function]], defined as <math>f(r) \equiv  e^{-\beta \Phi(r)} -1</math>.
*<math>f(r)</math> is the [[Mayer]] <math>f</math>-function, defined as <math>f(r) \equiv  e^{-\beta \Phi(r)} -1</math>.




Line 19: Line 19:
Because of this <math>h</math> must be determined [[self-consistently]].
Because of this <math>h</math> must be determined [[self-consistently]].
This need for self-consistency is characteristic of all many-body problems.
This need for self-consistency is characteristic of all many-body problems.
(Hansen \& McDonald \S 5.2 p. 106) For a system in an external field, the OZ has the form (5.2.7)
(Hansen and McDonald, section 5.2 p. 106) For a system in an external field, the OZ has the form (5.2.7)
:<math>h(1,2) = c(1,2) + \int \rho^{(1)}(3) c(1,3)h(3,2) d3</math>
:<math>h(1,2) = c(1,2) + \int \rho^{(1)}(3) c(1,3)h(3,2) d3</math>
If the system is both homogeneous and isotropic, the OZ relation becomes (Ref. 1Eq. 6)
If the system is both homogeneous and isotropic, the OZ relation becomes (Ref. 1Eq. 6)


<math>\gamma (r) \equiv  h(r) - c(r) = \rho \int  h(r')~c(|r - r'|) dr'</math>
<math>\gamma (r) \equiv  h(r) - c(r) = \rho \int  h(r')~c(|r - r'|) dr'</math>
In words, this equation (Hansen \& McDonald \S 5.2 p. 107)
 
In words, this equation (Hansen and McDonald, section 5.2 p. 107)
  ``...describes the fact that the ''total'' correlation between particles 1 and 2, represented by <math>h(1,2)</math>,  
  ``...describes the fact that the ''total'' correlation between particles 1 and 2, represented by <math>h(1,2)</math>,  
  is due in part to the ''direct'' correlation between 1 and 2, represented by <math>c(1,2)</math>, but also to the ''indirect'' correlation,   
  is due in part to the ''direct'' correlation between 1 and 2, represented by <math>c(1,2)</math>, but also to the ''indirect'' correlation,   
Line 73: Line 74:


==References==
==References==
#[KNAW_1914_17_0793]
#[L. S. Ornstein and F. Zernike "Accidental deviations of density and opalescence at the critical point of a single substance", Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Amsterdam Proc. Sec. Sci. '''17''' pp. 793- (1914)]
#[PRA_1992_45_000816]
#[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.45.816  James A. Given "Liquid-state methods for random media: Random sequential adsorption", Physical Review A '''45''' pp. 816 - 824 (1992)]
#[JCP_1995_103_02625]
#[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.470724      Der-Ming Duh and A. D. J. Haymet "Integral equation theory for uncharged liquids: The Lennard-Jones fluid and the bridge function", Journal of Chemical Physics '''103''' pp. 2625-2633 (1995)]
#[Hansen and MacDonald "Theory of Simple Liquids"]

Revision as of 14:59, 20 February 2007

Notation:


The Ornstein-Zernike relation (OZ) integral equation is

h=h[c]

where h[c] denotes a functional of c. This relation is exact. This is complemented by the closure relation

c=c[h]

Note that h depends on c, and c depends on h. Because of this h must be determined self-consistently. This need for self-consistency is characteristic of all many-body problems. (Hansen and McDonald, section 5.2 p. 106) For a system in an external field, the OZ has the form (5.2.7)

h(1,2)=c(1,2)+∫ρ(1)(3)c(1,3)h(3,2)d3

If the system is both homogeneous and isotropic, the OZ relation becomes (Ref. 1Eq. 6)

γ(r)≡h(r)−c(r)=ρ∫h(r′)c(|r−r′|)dr′

In words, this equation (Hansen and McDonald, section 5.2 p. 107)

``...describes the fact that the total correlation between particles 1 and 2, represented by h(1,2), 
is due in part to the direct correlation between 1 and 2, represented by c(1,2), but also to the indirect correlation,  
γ(r), propagated via increasingly large numbers of intermediate particles."

Notice that this equation is basically a convolution, i.e.

h≡c+ρh⊗c

(Note: the convolution operation written here as ⊗ is more frequently written as *) This can be seen by expanding the integral in terms of h(r) (here truncated at the fourth iteration):

h(r)=c(r)+ρ∫c(|r−r′|)c(r′)dr′+ρ2∫∫c(|r−r′|)c(|r′−r″|)c(r″)dr″dr′+ρ3∫∫∫c(|r−r′|)c(|r′−r″|)c(|r″−r‴|)c(r‴)dr‴dr″dr′+ρ4∫∫∫∫c(|r−r′|)c(|r′−r″|)c(|r″−r‴|)c(|r‴−r⁗|)h(r⁗)dr⁗dr‴dr″dr′

etc. Diagrammatically this expression can be written as (Ref. 2):

where the bold lines connecting root points denote c functions, the blobs denote h functions. An arrow pointing from left to right indicates an uphill path from one root point to another. An `uphill path' is a sequence of Mayer bonds passing through increasing particle labels. The OZ relation can be derived by performing a functional differentiation of the grand canonical distribution function (HM check this).

OZ equation in Fourier space

The OZ equation may be written in Fourier space as (Eq. 5 in Ref. 3):

γ^=(I−ρc^)−1c^ρc^

The carets denote the three-dimensional Fourier transformed quantities which reduce explicitly to:

γ^(k)=4πk∫0∞rsin(kr)γ(r)dr


γ(r)=12π2r∫0∞ksin(kr)γ^(r)dk

Note:

h^(0)=∫h(r)dr


c^(0)=∫c(r)dr

References

  1. [L. S. Ornstein and F. Zernike "Accidental deviations of density and opalescence at the critical point of a single substance", Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Amsterdam Proc. Sec. Sci. 17 pp. 793- (1914)]
  2. James A. Given "Liquid-state methods for random media: Random sequential adsorption", Physical Review A 45 pp. 816 - 824 (1992)
  3. Der-Ming Duh and A. D. J. Haymet "Integral equation theory for uncharged liquids: The Lennard-Jones fluid and the bridge function", Journal of Chemical Physics 103 pp. 2625-2633 (1995)
  4. [Hansen and MacDonald "Theory of Simple Liquids"]