Talk:Delaunay simplexes: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Carl McBride (talk | contribs) m (New section: Re-direct) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
(I should check these pages more often!) Indeed, a simplex is an ''n'' triangle (it has ''n''+1 vertices), but according to the CGAL project documentation a '''triangulation''' is a simplicial complex (not a triangle). Why not just leave it to "triangulation"? I think this is the usual wording. | (I should check these pages more often!) Indeed, a simplex is an ''n'' triangle (it has ''n''+1 vertices), but according to the CGAL project documentation a '''triangulation''' is a simplicial complex (not a triangle). Why not just leave it to "triangulation"? I think this is the usual wording. | ||
== Re-direct == | |||
Hi there Dr. Duque, | |||
I have created a redirect page called [[Delaunay triangulation]] which leads to [[Delaunay simplexes]]. This way | |||
I think we cover the options without restricting ourselves to 3-space. What do you think? --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 11:40, 9 October 2007 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:40, 9 October 2007
Isn't this a "complex", not a "simplex"?
Complex/simplex[edit]
Hi there Dr. Duque,
I kind of understand a simplex to be an n-dimensional triangle and a special case of a simplicial complex. However, I do say kind of understand. If you know that it is indeed a complex rather than a simplex, the page can be re-named. -- Carl McBride 16:25, 12 September 2007 (CEST)
Triangle/triangulation[edit]
(I should check these pages more often!) Indeed, a simplex is an n triangle (it has n+1 vertices), but according to the CGAL project documentation a triangulation is a simplicial complex (not a triangle). Why not just leave it to "triangulation"? I think this is the usual wording.
Re-direct[edit]
Hi there Dr. Duque,
I have created a redirect page called Delaunay triangulation which leads to Delaunay simplexes. This way I think we cover the options without restricting ourselves to 3-space. What do you think? -- Carl McBride (talk) 11:40, 9 October 2007 (CEST)