Mean spherical approximation: Difference between revisions
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
| Carl McBride (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary | Carl McBride (talk | contribs)  mNo edit summary | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :<math>c(r) = -\beta \omega(r), ~~~~ r>\sigma.</math> | :<math>c(r) = -\beta \omega(r), ~~~~ r>\sigma.</math> | ||
| The  | The '''Blum and Hoye''' mean spherical approximation (MSA) (1978-1980) (Refs 2 and 3) closure is given by | ||
| closure is given by | |||
| :<math>{\rm g}_{ij}(r) \equiv h_{ij}(r) +1=0 ~~~~~~~~ r < \sigma_{ij} = (\sigma_i + \sigma_j)/2</math> | :<math>{\rm g}_{ij}(r) \equiv h_{ij}(r) +1=0 ~~~~~~~~ r < \sigma_{ij} = (\sigma_i + \sigma_j)/2</math> | ||
| Line 13: | Line 11: | ||
| :<math>c_{ij}(r)= \sum_{n=1} \frac{K_{ij}^{(n)}}{r}e^{-z_nr} ~~~~~~ \sigma_{ij} < r</math> | :<math>c_{ij}(r)= \sum_{n=1} \frac{K_{ij}^{(n)}}{r}e^{-z_nr} ~~~~~~ \sigma_{ij} < r</math> | ||
| where  | where <math>h_{ij}(r)</math> and <math>c_{ij}(r)</math> are the total and the direct correlation functions for two spherical | ||
| molecules of  | molecules of ''i'' and ''j'' species, <math>\sigma_i</math> is the diameter of '''i'' species of molecule.\ | ||
| Duh and Haymet (Eq. 9 \cite{JCP_1995_103_02625}) write the MSA approximation as | Duh and Haymet (Eq. 9 \cite{JCP_1995_103_02625}) write the MSA approximation as | ||
| Line 32: | Line 30: | ||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
| #[PR_1966_144_000251] | #[PR_1966_144_000251] | ||
| #[JSP_1978_19_0317_nolotengoSpringer] | |||
| #[JSP_1980_22_0661_nolotengoSpringer] | |||
Revision as of 13:10, 23 February 2007
The Lebowitz and Percus mean spherical approximation (MSA) (1966) (Ref. 1) closure is given by
The Blum and Hoye mean spherical approximation (MSA) (1978-1980) (Refs 2 and 3) closure is given by
and
where and are the total and the direct correlation functions for two spherical molecules of i and j species, is the diameter of 'i species of molecule.\ Duh and Haymet (Eq. 9 \cite{JCP_1995_103_02625}) write the MSA approximation as
where $\Phi_1$ and $\Phi_2$ comes from the WCA division of the LJ potential.\\ By introducing the definition (Eq. 10 \cite{JCP_1995_103_02625})
one can arrive at (Eq. 11 \cite{JCP_1995_103_02625})
The Percus Yevick approximation may be recovered from the above equation by setting .
References
- [PR_1966_144_000251]
- [JSP_1978_19_0317_nolotengoSpringer]
- [JSP_1980_22_0661_nolotengoSpringer]