Notation:
 is the pair distribution function. is the pair distribution function.
 is the pair potential acting between pairs. is the pair potential acting between pairs.
 is the total correlation function is the total correlation function . .
 is the direct correlation function. is the direct correlation function.
 is the  indirect (or series or  chain) correlation function is the  indirect (or series or  chain) correlation function . .
 is the cavity correlation function is the cavity correlation function 
 is the  bridge function. is the  bridge function.
 is the thermal potential, is the thermal potential, . .
 is the [[Mayer is the [[Mayer -function]], defined as -function]], defined as . .
The Ornstein-Zernike relation (OZ) integral equation is
![{\displaystyle h=h\left[c\right]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/e66a42d2a4fc9e2fdba525b2bf9fd63423158d36) 
where  ![{\displaystyle h[c]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/e452ec3f3236026f5ef8925c3eade3105e6dd60a) denotes a functional of
 denotes a functional of  . This relation is exact.
This is complemented by the closure relation
. This relation is exact.
This is complemented by the closure relation
![{\displaystyle c=c\left[h\right]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/3340b88402144027bfb655ef124c16d903cca221) 
Note that  depends on
 depends on  , and
, and  depends on
 depends on  .
Because of this
.
Because of this  must be determined self-consistently.
This need for self-consistency is characteristic of all many-body problems.
(Hansen \& McDonald \S 5.2 p. 106) For a system in an external field, the OZ has the form (5.2.7)
 must be determined self-consistently.
This need for self-consistency is characteristic of all many-body problems.
(Hansen \& McDonald \S 5.2 p. 106) For a system in an external field, the OZ has the form (5.2.7)
 
If the system is both homogeneous and isotropic, the OZ relation becomes (\cite{KNAW_1914_17_0793} Eq. 6)
 In words, this equation (Hansen \& McDonald \S 5.2 p. 107)
In words, this equation (Hansen \& McDonald \S 5.2 p. 107)
``...describes the fact that the total correlation between particles 1 and 2, represented by  , 
is due in part to the direct correlation between 1 and 2, represented by
, 
is due in part to the direct correlation between 1 and 2, represented by  , but also to the indirect correlation,
, but also to the indirect correlation,  
 , propagated via increasingly large numbers of intermediate particles." , propagated via increasingly large numbers of intermediate particles."
Notice that this equation is basically a convolution, i.e.
 
(Note: the convolution operation written here as  is more frequently written as
 is more frequently written as  )
This can be seen by expanding the integral in terms of
)
This can be seen by expanding the integral in terms of  (here truncated at the fourth iteration):
(here truncated at the fourth iteration):
 
etc.
Diagrammatically this expression can be written as  \cite{PRA_1992_45_000816}:
\begin{figure}[H]
\begin{center} 
\includegraphics[clip,height=30pt,width=350pt]{oz_diag.eps}
\end{center} 
\end{figure}
\noindent
where the bold lines connecting root points denote  functions, the blobs denote
 functions, the blobs denote  functions.
An arrow pointing from left to right indicates an uphill path from one root
point to another. An `uphill path' is a sequence of Mayer bonds passing through increasing
particle labels.
The OZ relation can be derived by performing a functional differentiation 
of the grand canonical distribution function (HM check this).
 functions.
An arrow pointing from left to right indicates an uphill path from one root
point to another. An `uphill path' is a sequence of Mayer bonds passing through increasing
particle labels.
The OZ relation can be derived by performing a functional differentiation 
of the grand canonical distribution function (HM check this).
References